Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26652 (HP)

NARENDER THAKUR v. Himachal Road Transport Corporation

CWP/17360/2026 · 2026-10-05

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.17360 of 2026 Decided on: 05.10.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Narender Thakur …..Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Rakesh K Dogra, Advocate vice Mr. S.P. Chatterji, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Deepak Sharma, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents in the respective matters. 2. Petitioner seeks direction to the respondents to grant him the benefit of pay fixation after counting the approved military service rendered by him in Armed Forces. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already preferred representation to 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 respondent No.1 on 05.08.2026 (Annexure P-5) for claiming the above relief. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to decide the aforesaid representation within a fixed time schedule. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents is not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.1/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-5) in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua October 5, 2026 Judge R.Atal