Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26650 (PNJ)

GURJIT SINGH @ NEETU v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/6084/2026 · 2026-07-06

Sumeet Goel

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 157 CRWP-6084-2026 GURJIT SINGH @ NEETU .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS DATE OF DECISION: 06.07.2026 DATE OF UPLOADING: 06.07.2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: - Ms. Ravisha Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Hemant Aggarwal, DAG, Punjab. ….. SUMEET GOEL , J (ORAL) Notice of motion, at this juncture to respondents No.1 to 4 only. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Hemant Aggarwal, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Learned State counsel (on instructions from SI Tarsem Singh) has submitted that the two representations dated 27.03.2026 and 07.04.2026 filed by the petitioner have since been adjudicated upon and the same have been consigned to record. Faced with the situation, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that she would be satisfied, for the nonce, in case copies of the decisions on the above two representations are supplied to the petitioner within a period of 15 days from today. JATIN 2026.07.06 18:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-6084-2026 -2- The petition in hand is accordingly disposed of with the direction to the SSP, Amritsar Rural, Punjab, to have the aforesaid decisions on the two representations supplied to the petitioner within a period of two weeks from today. Disposed of accordinly. Needless to say, the petitioner shall be at liberty to take recourse to the appropriate remedy in accordance with law against the said decisions as also to seek any other relief(s), if so advised. (SUMEET GOEL) 06.07.2026 JUDGE Jatin Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No JATIN 2026.07.06 18:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document