Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2665 (PNJ)

M/S NKC PROJECTS PVT LTD v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

RSA/2423/2022 · 2026-04-22

Nidhi Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CM Nos. 4331 RSA-2423- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 112 M/s NKC Projects Pvt. Ltd. State of Haryana and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) CM-4331-C 1. fixed in the main case from 2. 3. supported by an affidavit, the same is the main appeal is preponed from 24.09.2026 to today itself. CM-4332-C 1. Order XXIII Rule 2. plaintiff that the the concurrent judgments and decrees rendered by both the District Courts 4331-4332-C-2026 in -2022 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM Nos. 4331 RSA Date of Decision: M/s NKC Projects Pvt. Ltd. .… Versus State of Haryana and others .... Non CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Ms. Eliza Gupta and Mr. Arjun Singh, Advocates for the applicant-appellant. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) C-2026 This is an application for preponment of the date of hearing fixed in the main case from 24.09.2026 to some early date of hearing. Heard. For the reasons mentioned in the application supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed; the main appeal is preponed from 24.09.2026 to today itself. C-2026 in/and RSA-2423-2022 (O&M) Prayer in the application (CM Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC, is for withdrawal of the main second appeal It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant/appellant that the present appeal has been preferred by the plaintiff against the concurrent judgments and decrees rendered by both the District Courts IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM Nos. 4331-4332-C-2026 in RSA-2423-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 22.04.2026 .… Applicant/Appellant Non-applicant/Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Ms. Eliza Gupta and Mr. Arjun Singh, Advocates This is an application for preponment of the date of hearing to some early date of hearing. For the reasons mentioned in the application which is allowed; and the date of hearing in the main appeal is preponed from 24.09.2026 to today itself. 2022 (O&M) CM-4332-C-2026) filed under withdrawal of the main second appeal. is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant/appellant/ present appeal has been preferred by the plaintiff against the concurrent judgments and decrees rendered by both the District Courts This is an application for preponment of the date of hearing which is date of hearing in filed under present appeal has been preferred by the plaintiff against the concurrent judgments and decrees rendered by both the District Courts RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.24 13:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CM Nos. 4331 RSA-2423- whereby suit for permanent injunction dismissed. Now, the appellant has decided not to pursue the present appeal any further and without any coercion or undue influence. 3. 4. application which is supported by an affidavit, the same is the main second appeal is 5. 22.04.2026 rishu 4331-4332-C-2026 in -2022 (O&M) -2- whereby suit for permanent injunction dismissed. Now, the appellant has decided not to pursue the present appeal any further and seeks permission to withdraw the and without any coercion or undue influence. Heard. In view of the above and for the reasons mentioned in the application which is supported by an affidavit, the same is the main second appeal is ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable whereby suit for permanent injunction filed by the plaintiff was dismissed. Now, the appellant has decided not to pursue the present and seeks permission to withdraw the same voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. In view of the above and for the reasons mentioned in the application which is supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed; and dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No d by the plaintiff was dismissed. Now, the appellant has decided not to pursue the present voluntarily In view of the above and for the reasons mentioned in the and RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.24 13:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.