Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26645 (CAL)

MOULI BOSE v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/14396/2026 · 2026-07-08

Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

11 08.07. 2026 Ct. No. 18 Ab IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE. WPA 14396 of 2026 Mouli Bose Vs. State of West Bengal and others. --------------- Mr. Firdous Samim, Ms. Gopa Biswas, Ms. Ankita Ghosh, Mr. Naman Shah, Ms. Brinta Dutta. … for the petitioner. Ms. Aparna Banerjee, Ld. AGP, Mr. Arijit Bhowmick. … for the State. 1. The affidavit of service filed today is taken on record. 2. The petitioner was employed as a Block Project Manager under the Patharpratima Block in South 24- Parganas from 2014. She has been continuing in service without any disruption in different blocks and indeed was given Satisfactory Performance Certificate on several occasions by the concerned authorities. 3. The petitioner has been discontinued from service, abruptly in 2022 on the ground of unsatisfactory performance, even after receiving the Satisfactory Performance Certificate in February 2022. 4. The petitioner has made several representations bringing on record her Satisfactory Performance Certificates, none of which have been considered. 2 5. In fact, the last representation made by the petitioner sometime in October 2024 is lying unattended by the concerned authorities. 6. In view of the afore-stated, I direct the respondent no. 4 to consider the representation of October 1, 2024, as appended at page 106 of this writ petition, in line with the prevalent notifications concerning the service of the petitioner herein. 7. The entire exercise of considering the representation should be completed by August 20, 2026 and the resultant order therefrom should be communicated to the petitioner as well as the concerned authorities by August 30, 2026. 8. With the afore-stated directions, the writ petition is disposed of. 9. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. 10. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.) 3