Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26643 (KAR)

SRI JAYACHANDRA URS T D v. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED

WP/938/2024 · 2026-07-08

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34208 WP No. 938 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 938 OF 2024 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. JAYACHANDRA URS T.D., S/O. DEVARAJ URS T, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, NO.904, 1ST CROSS, 3RD MAIN, VIDYARANYAPURAM, MYSURU-570008. 2. SMT. ANURADHA J. URS, W/O. SRI. JAYACHANDRA URS T.D., AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, NO.904, 1ST CROSS, 3RD MAIN, VIDYARANYAPURAM, MYSURU-570008. 3. M/S. N.J.STATIONARY, REPRESENTED BY IT PROPRIETOR, SRI. JAYACHANDRA URS T.D., NO.11B, CHAMUNDESHWARI INDUSTRIAL COMPOUND, MANANDAVADI ROAD, MYSURU SOUTH-570008. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. PRAKASH M.PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED, 3RD FLOOR, 22 M.G. ROAD, NEAR TRINITY METRO STATION, BENGALURU-560001. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34208 WP No. 938 of 2024 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR D. PATIL. 2. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED, REGISTERED OFFICE, 24 BKC, C27, G BLOCK, BANDRA KURLA COMPLEX, BANDRA (E), MUMBAI-400051. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. AVINASH B.C., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Prakash M.Patil, counsel for the petitioners and Sri.Avinash B.C., counsel for the respondents appeared in person. 2. The possession notice dated:13.12.2023 issued by 1st respondent vide Annexure-A is called into question in this writ petition on several grounds as setout in the memorandum of writ petition. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34208 WP No. 938 of 2024 3. Counsel for the respective parties urged several contentions. Sri.Avinash B.C., counsel for the respondents, on instruction submits that the possession dated 13.12.2023 has been withdrawn by the Bank on 23.12.2025. Counsel, therefore, submits that an appropriate order may be passed. 4. Taking note of the said submission, nothing survives for consideration in the present writ petition. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Because of disposal of the Writ Petition, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37