Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26640 (CHH)

RAMKRISHNA YADAV v. PRADUM YADAV

WP227/823/2026 · 2026-07-09

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010261822026 2026:CGHC:29120 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 823 of 2026 1 - Ramkrishna Yadav S/o Shri Pitambar Yadav Aged About 47 Years R/o Village Tarashiv Post Office Chicholi Police Station Tilda Nevra District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Mithlesh Yadav S/o Shri Ramkrishna Yadav Aged About 17 Years Minor Through Legal Representative Father Ramkrishna Yadav R/o Village Tarashiv Post Office Chicholi Police Station Tilda Nevra District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Yogesh Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Ramkrishna Yadav Aged About 14 Years Minor Through Legal Representative Father Ramkrishna Yadav R/o Village Tarashiv Post Office Chicholi Police Station Tilda Nevra District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Pradum Yadav S/o Shri Purshottam Yadav Through M/s Midland Carrier Proprietor Rajesh Malu Resident Of H I J - 18 Ward No-46 Padmanabhpur Durg District- Durg Chhattisgarh (Vehicle Traller No C G -07 C N - 4260 Driver) 2 - M/s Midland Carrier Proprietor Rajesh Malu Resident Of H I J -18 Ward No.46, Padmanabpur Durg District- Durg (Chhattisgarh) (Vehicle Traller No C G -07 C N - 4260 Owner) 3 - United India Insurance Company Limited Through Divisional Manager (Division No.1) Krishna Complex Kucheri Chowk Jail Road Tehsil And District- Raipur Chhattisgarh (Vehicle Traller No. C G -07 C N - 4260 (Insurer) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Praveen Dhurandhar, Advocate SUMIT KUMAR Digitally signed by SUMIT KUMAR Date: 2026.07.13 15:52:15 +0530 2 (Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.) Order on Board 10/07/2026 1. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present writ petition with liberty to file his fresh application before the learned Claims Tribunal for premature withdrawal of the fix deposit amount alongwith additional facts and documents. 2. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 3. In the eventuality of fling a fresh application by the applicant before the learned Claims Tribunal, the same shall be decided in accordance with law, on its own merits, without influencing the earlier order passed by the Claims Tribunal. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE Sumit