Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26636 (HP)

SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. PUSHPA DEVI

CMP/24402/2026 · 2026-10-06

Sushil Kukreja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Shriram GIC Ltd. Vs. Pushpa Devi & Ors. CMPs No. 24402 & 24403/2026 in FAO No. 207/2014 06.10.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the non- applicant/appellant. Mr. Ashok K. Verma, Advocate, for applicants/respondents No. 2 & 3. CMP No. 24402/2026 The present application under Order 32, Rule 12, read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, has been filed by applicants/respondents No. 2 & 3 for discharging their natural guardian, as they have attained the age of majority. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by the affidavits of both the applicants and also taking into consideration the fact that the applicants have now attained the age of majority, as is evident from their Birth Certificates, appended with the application as Annexure A-1 (colly), wherein date of birth of applicant/respondent No. 2 Sahil Sharma has been mentioned as 28.02.2006 and date of birth of applicant/respondent No. 3 Kirti Kumari has been mentioned as 05.10.2007, the present application is allowed and natural guardianship of applicants/respondents No. 2 & 3 is ordered to be discharged and they are permitted to pursue the case in their own capacity. The application stands disposed of. CMP No. 24403/2026 The present application under Section 151 of CPC has been filed on behalf of applicants/respondents No. 2 & 3, for release of the award amount, alongwith up- to-date interest, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court. The application is duly supported by the affidavits of both the applicants. No reply to the application is intended to be filed and learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant has no objection in case the prayer made in the application is allowed, as no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court and the same has attained finality. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by the affidavits of both the applicants, coupled with the fact that till date, no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court and the same has attained finality, the same is allowed and the award amount, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court, alongwith up-to-date interest, is ordered to be released in favour of applicants/respondents No. 2 & 3, as per their respective shares, after proper verification and identification, by remitting the same to their bank accounts, details whereof have been mentioned in para-4 of the application. The application stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 6th October, 2026 (raman)