MAN CHAND AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER
CWP/17873/2026 · 2026-10-07
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26632 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26632 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 17748/2026
Decided on: 07.10.2026 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.
CWP No. 17748/2026
Laiq Ram Sharma & Ors.
…..Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. and Anr.
.....Respondents
2.
CWP No. 17752/2026
Ram Partap
…..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and Anr.
.....Respondents
3.
CWP No. 17754/2026
Siddharth Chauhan & Anr.
…..Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. and Anr.
.....Respondents
4.
CWP No. 17755/2026
Ramesh & Ors.
…..Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. and Anr.
.....Respondents
5.
CWP No. 17873/2026
Man Chand & Ors.
…..Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. and Anr.
.....Respondents
6.
CWP No. 17751/2026
2 Ravinder Kumar Sharma
…..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and Anr.
.....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2.
Petitioners seek applicability of Jogi Ram Bhardwaj Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2 It is, however, seen from the record that the petitioners have not preferred their representations for the redressal of their grievances raised in these writ petitions.
3.
Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be preferring their respective representations within two weeks from today. In case such representations are so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment within a period of six weeks
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 CWP No. 2503/2024 decided on 04.06.2025
3 thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioners.
The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua 07.10.2026
Judge rohit