APHC010643972023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: Between: 1. T.KRISHNAVENI, W/O T.MAHADEVA, AGE 35 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, RUNNING INDUSTRIAL UNIT, R/O TALLAMADUGU YADAMARI MANDAL AND BANGALORE. 1. S SWARNALATHA, W/O P.JEEVANESWAR NAIDU, AGE 45 OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O D.NO.4 2. R NAGAVENI, W/O R.RAMESH, AGE 50 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O D.NO.4-540/A, MARATA STREET, GREAMSPET, CHITTOOR. Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, pr circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to allow the Revision by setting aside the order dated 05 passed in IA.No.l91 of 2023 in OS.No.59 of 2018, on the file of the Principal District Judge, Chittoor and consequently allow the IA.No.l91 of 2023 as prayed for and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in OS.No.59 of 2018, on the file of the Principal District Judge, Chittoor, pending disposal of CRP., and pass IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3344/2023 T.KRISHNAVENI, W/O T.MAHADEVA, AGE 35 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, RUNNING INDUSTRIAL UNIT, R/O TALLAMADUGU YADAMARI MANDAL AND BANGALORE. ...PETITIONER AND S SWARNALATHA, W/O P.JEEVANESWAR NAIDU, AGE 45 OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O D.NO.4-829, GRAMSPET, CHITTOOR. R NAGAVENI, W/O R.RAMESH, AGE 50 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, 540/A, MARATA STREET, GREAMSPET, CHITTOOR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to allow the Revision by setting aside the order dated 05 passed in IA.No.l91 of 2023 in OS.No.59 of 2018, on the file of the Principal e, Chittoor and consequently allow the IA.No.l91 of 2023 as Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to tay all further proceedings in OS.No.59 of 2018, on the file of the Principal District Judge, Chittoor, pending disposal of CRP., and pass IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI T.KRISHNAVENI, W/O T.MAHADEVA, AGE 35 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, RUNNING INDUSTRIAL UNIT, R/O TALLAMADUGU ...PETITIONER S SWARNALATHA, W/O P.JEEVANESWAR NAIDU, AGE 45 YEARS, 829, GRAMSPET, CHITTOOR. R NAGAVENI, W/O R.RAMESH, AGE 50 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, 540/A, MARATA STREET, GREAMSPET, CHITTOOR. ...RESPONDENT(S): aying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to allow the Revision by setting aside the order dated 05-12-2023 passed in IA.No.l91 of 2023 in OS.No.59 of 2018, on the file of the Principal e, Chittoor and consequently allow the IA.No.l91 of 2023 as Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to tay all further proceedings in OS.No.59 of 2018, on the file of the Principal 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the interim stay order dated 23-12-2023, passed in CRP.No.3344 of 2023, pending disposal of main CRP., and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K V L NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. T JANARDHAN RAO 3 The Court made the following order: Though the matter is listed today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. On earlier occasions also i.e., on 16.03.2026, 02.03.2026 and 16.02.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications are closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 30.03.2026 MP 4 96 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3344 of 2023 Date: 30.03.2026 MP