2026:JHHC:28321 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8706 of 2026 Galib Ansari, aged about 38 years, son of late Abdul Hanan, R/o village Dumeriya, P.S. and P.O. – Karmatar, District Jamtara … … Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel, Advocate : Mr. Abhishek Singh, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl. PP --- 03/18.09.2026 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 06.06.2026 in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.33 of 2026, registered under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2) of BNS, Sections 66(B)(C)(D) of IT Act and Section 42(3)(e) of Telecommunication Act, 2023, now pending in the court of learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the bail application of the petitioner was earlier rejected in B.A. No. 7255 of 2026 vide order dated 10.08.2026 as the investigation was still going on. He now submits that the charge has been framed on 11.09.2026. The petitioner is in custody since 06.06.2026 having no criminal antecedent. 4. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is not in dispute. 5. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the fact that charge has already been framed and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2026:JHHC:28321 2 satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.33 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 6. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:18.09.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:19.09.2026