Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26626 (AP)

B VIJAYA DURGA v. P PRASANTHI

CC/6783/2023 · 2026-03-01

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010641352023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 6783/2023 Between: 1. B VIJAYA DURGA, W/O. ADINARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO. 5-75, NEAR DURGAMMA TEMPLE, DEGAPURAM (V), BHIMAVARAM MANDAL AND WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. P PRASANTHI, W/o. not known to Petitioner, Aged. Major, Occ. District Collector, West Godavari District, At Bhimavaram ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the Contemnor under Sections 10 and 12 of Contempt of Court Act, for deliberately violating the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 31.08.2023 passed in W.P. No. 17415 of 2023 by His Lordship s Hon'ble Sri. Justice Ravi Cheemalapati and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the proposed Respondent No.2 as party respondents in the Contempt Case No. 6783 of 2023 and pass 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. URIMILA RANI PATRO Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. The Court made the following: ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 31.08.2023 passed in W.P.No.17415 of 2023. Despite lapse of 3 years since the date of filing of the contempt, the learned counsel for the petitioner was never ready and he sought time on number of occasions. Today also, learned counsel sought time without any reason. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file a memo affidavit as to why his name should not be referred to the bar council. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 02nd March, 2026 RKS