Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26618 (MAD)

R. Mani v. The District collector

WP/20163/2026 · 2026-05-20

G R Swaminathan, V Lakshminarayanan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 20163 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-05-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WP No. 20163 of 2026 & WMP NO. 21582 OF 2026 R. Mani S/o Raman, D. no 24/88 C-3-B Jaijavan Main Illam, West Main road, Mettur Dam -1 Salem district ..Petitioner Vs 1. The District collector Salem District, Salem 2. The Tahsildar Mettur Taluk office, Salem District 3. The revenue Inspector Revenue Inspector office, mettur, Salem District ..Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 1st respondent to dispose the stay application filed by the petitioner dated 15.05.2026 along with the Appeal filled against the Notice issued u/s 6 of the Tamil Nadu land Encroachment Act https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 20163 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 1905 dated 12.05.2026 received by the petitioner on 14.05.2026 and till such time the 2nd respondent is directed not to evict the petitioner from the land situated in Ward -A Block -43 survey no 6/1, mettur Taluk, Salem District to the extent of 0.0227.0 square Meter. For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.Elangovan for Mr.K.A.Prabaharan For Respondent(s): Mr.L.S.M.Hasan Fizal Additional Government Pleader ORDER (Order of the Court was made by G.R.Swaminathan J.) Heard both sides. 2. The Petitioner suffered an order under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905. The petitioner has also filed an appeal before the District Collector, Salem. During the pendency of the appeal, the eviction order sought to be enforced. If the petitioner is evicted in the meanwhile, his appeal would become infructuous. 3. We are therefore of the view that the petitioner has to be given some relief till the disposal of the appeal. 4. We direct the respondents to keep the impugned proceedings in abeyance till the petitioner’s appeal is disposed of by the 1st Respondent. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 20163 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 5. We make it clear that We have not gone into the merits of the matter. 6. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [G.R.S.,J.] [V.L.N.,J.] 20-05-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No GV/msr To 1. The District collector Salem District, Salem 2. The Tahsildar Mettur Taluk office, Salem District 3. The Revenue Inspector Revenue Inspector office, Mettur, Salem District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 20163 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 G.R.SWAMINATHAN J. AND V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN J. GV/msr WP No. 20163 of 2026 AND WMP NO. 21582 OF 2026 20-05-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis