- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33852-DB RFA No. 574 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 574 OF 2016 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. B.M. MANJUNATH S/O B.R. MANJEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDENT OF BALEHALLI VILLAGE, BIDARAHALLI POST, MUDIGERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT-577101 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. LOKESHA G., ADVOCATE(ABSENT)) AND: 1. SMT. B.M. KALAVATHI W/O NARASIMHEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, RESIDENT OF "SAMPADA" RAVINDRANAGARA, 3RD CROSS, BEHIND ADICHUNCHANAGAIRI MAHILA SAMAJA, HASSAN TOWN-573201. 2. SMT B M ANNAPOORNA W/O B.J. NAGESH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT HOUSING BOARD, 2ND CROSS, LIG-4, MUDIGERE TOWN, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT-577101. Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33852-DB RFA No. 574 of 2016 3. B.R. MANJEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS, S/O RAMEGOWDA, 4. SMT SEETHAMMA W/O B.R. MANJEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R3 AND R4 RESIDING OF J M ROAD MUDIGERE TOWN AND TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT 5. SRI B.C. DAYAKARA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, S/O CHANDREGOWDA, R/O BALEHALLI, BIDARAHALLI POST, MUDIGERE TALUK-572101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BRIJESH PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R5; SMT. SHWETHA ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R2, R4 AND R5) ********* THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 02.01.2016 PASSED IN OS.NO.107/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE Ist ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JDUGE CHIKKAMAGALURU TO ITINERATE AT MUDIGERE, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION AND MESNE PROFITS. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33852-DB RFA No. 574 of 2016 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) None appeared for the appellant either in the first call or in the revised call. 2. It appears the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. 3. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE SD/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE NG CT: SN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3