Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26604 (HP)

RAJEEV KUMAR v. RAKESH KULLA

CRMPM/2011/2026 · 2026-10-07

Rakesh Kainthla

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Rajeev Kumar vs. Rakesh Kulla Cr.MP(M) No. 2011 of 2026 07.10.2026 Present: Mr. Kulbhushan Khajuria, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vishvinder Singh, Advocate, for the respondent. Power of Attorney filed on behalf of the respondent. Learned counsel for the respondent under instructions submitted that he has no objection for condonation of delay. In view of this statement, the application is allowed and the delay in filing the revision is ordered to be condoned. The present application stands disposed of. Cr. Revision(ST) No. 8890 of 2026 and CrMP(ST) No. 8893 of 2026 The delay in filing the revision has been ordered to be condoned vide separate order passed in Cr.MP(M) No. 2011 of 2026. Revision and the application be registered. Copy of the revision be supplied to the learned counsel for the respondent. Learned counsel for the parties have submitted that the matter is being reconciled between the parties. In view of this statement, petitioner is directed to deposit 7.5% of the cheque amount before Member, Secretary, H.P. Legal Services Authority, Kasumpti, Shimla, as per the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Sanjabij Tari vs. Kishore S. Brocar and another (2025) SCC Online SC 2069 and list the matter thereafter. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 7th October, 2026 (Nikita)