Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26596 (AP)

S ANANDA BABU v. SRI V.VIJAYA RAMA RAJU, IAS

CC/3781/2025 · 2026-03-15

Nyapathy Vijay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010643092025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3781/2025 Between: 1. S ANANDA BABU, S/O S RAMACHARI AGED 59 YEARS PRESENTLY WORKING AS SCHOOL ASSISTANT PHYSICAL SCIENCE AT ZPHS KUPPAMGIRLS SCHOOL KUPPAM MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI V VIJAYA RAMA RAJU IAS, THE COMMISSIONER, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, R/O D.NO.398/3, VIDYABHAVAN, VENKATADRI TOWERS, ATMAKUR, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. - 522503. 2. SMT B VARALAKSHMI, DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICE, MSR CIRCLE, PALAMANERU ROAD, CHITTOOR, ANDHRA PRADESH 517001 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondent herein for wilfully, wantonly and deliberately disobeying the interim order of the Hon’ble Court dated 10.09.2025 passed by this Hon’ble Court in W.P.No.23911 of 2025 in the interest of justice, and pass such other orders. 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the Certified Copy of the Order dated 10.09.2025 passed in W.P. No. 23911 of 2025 and pass such other orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G.SAI LOCHAN Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. G V L MURTHY The Court made the following: 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CONTEMPT CASE No.3781 of 2025 ORDER: 1. The present Contempt Case is filed for non-compliance of the Order dated 10.09.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.23911 of 2025. 2. At the time of hearing, the learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the order was complied with and requested to close the Contempt Case. 3. In that view, the Contempt Case is closed. 4. No order as to costs. 5. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 16.03.2026 IS 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CONTEMPT CASE No.3781 of 2025 Date: 16.03.2026 IS