JITENDRA KANJAR S/O NANDKISHORE v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/4024/2026 · 2026-03-16
Sameer Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2659 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2659 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:11124] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4024/2026 Jitendra Kanjar S/o Nandkishore, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Kishanpuriya Police Station Sadar Jhalawar District Jhalawar (Raj) (At Present Confined In District Jail Jhalawar (Raj) ---Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. J.P. Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 16/03/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 262/2025 registered at Police Station Jhalawar Sadar District Jhalawar for the offence(s) under Section 3/25 of Arms Act and the learned Trial Court amidst the offences under Section 5/25 of Arms Act dismissed the bail application before it.
2.
Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is behind bars ever-since 13.10.2025. It is next submitted that the applicant is sole bread earner of the family, aged about 24 years. It is further submitted that the main accused has already been granted bail by the learned Trial Court. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the instant bail application and submitted that the applicant is a habitual
[2026:RJ-JP:11124] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4024/2026] offender with as many as 9 criminal antecedents, if enlarged on bail, he may be a threat to society at large. The criminal antecedents of the accused-applicant are reproduced herein below: Ø- la- eqdnek ua- e; fnukad /kkjk PkktZ’khV ua- o fnukad uke Fkkuk 01 91@06-06-2016 148]149]307
Hkk-na-la- rFkk
/kkjk&3@25 vkElZ ,DV 100@22-08-16 02 154@06-08-18 136 fo|qr vf/kfu;e 118@31-08-18 lqusy 03 143@07-07-2019 379 Hkk-na-la- 121@20-07-19 04 149@10-07-19 399]402 Hkk-na-la- rFkk /kkjk&4@25 vkElZ ,DV 124@26-07-19 05 262@21-12-20 379 Hkk-na-la- 46@27-04-22 jkorHkkVk 06 215@02-11-21 457]380 Hkk-na-la- 58@07-04-22 jk;iqj 07 234@24-11-21 379] 411]120ch Hkk-na-la- 57@04-04-22 jk;iqj 08 16@13-01-22 457]380 Hkk-na-la- 49@31-03-22 fiMkok 09 20@22 457]380]411]120ch Hkk-na- la- 39@20-03-22 <kch cwUnh
4. Having heard the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, considering the fact that the applicant is a young person, aged about 24 years; that the applicant is in custody ever since 13.10.2025; that the applicant is sole bread earner of the family; that the main accused has been granted bail by the learned Trial Court, looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, taking note of the fact that there are as many as nine criminal antecedents registered against the applicant; that the applicant is stated to be a threat to the society if he is enlarged on bail and keeping in mind the sacrosanct
[2026:RJ-JP:11124] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4024/2026] objective of Indian criminal reformative system and balancing the equity between right of the liberty, strong criminal antecedents and young age of applicant, this Court is inclined to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail with following conditions: 4.1 That the applicant will go for his employment/work and reside 250 kms away from the place of his current residence for a period of six months as the applicant is habitual offender. 4.2 That on every 5th of successive month, applicant will mark attendance before the jurisdictional police station. 5.
Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Jitendra Kanjar S/o Nandkishore shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK /83