ROHIT KUMAR ANDANOTHER v. RAKESH KANWAR AND ANOTHER
COPC/1571/2026 · 2026-10-05
Ranjan Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26583 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26583 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:HHC:43119
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
COPC No. 1571 of 2026
Date of decision: 05.10.2026. Rohit Kumar & another
...Petitioners.
Versus
Rakesh Kanwar & another
...Respondents.
Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Vikrant, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Varun Chandel, Additional Advocate General.
Ranjan Sharma, Judge:
Petitioners have invoked the contempt jurisdiction of this Court, alleging non-compliance to the order dated 16.06.2026 [Annexure C-1], in CWP No. 8890 of 2026, titled as rohit Kumar & another versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another, whereby the Coordinate Bench of this Court had passed the following orders:-
“Issue notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. As prayed for, this petition is disposed of with the direction that representations (Annexure P-4 Colly.) filed by the petitioners
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the
judgment? Yes
-2-
be decided by the Competent Authority within a period of twelve weeks from today in terms of the contents therein. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of.”
2.
Basing reference to the orders dated 16.06.2026, [Annexure C-1], Learned Counsel for petitioner submits that the Respondents have neither decided the representation nor any speaking order has been conveyed to the petitioner as yet.
3.
Heard.
4.
Notice. Mr. Varun Chandel, Learned Additional Advocate General, waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
5.
As prayed by Learned Counsel for petitioner and considering the matter in above perspective, this Court disposes of the instant petition with direction to the Respondents/Competent Authority to decide the representation within a period of six weeks from today positively [if not already decided].
6.
Needless to say that in case the representation has already been decided, the decision on the representation/ speaking order be conveyed to the petitioner within the aforesaid period.
-3-
7.
In aforesaid terms, the instant proceedings are closed and notice is discharged.
(Ranjan Sharma)
Judge 5th October, 2026. (kck)