PREM KUMAR KARMALI @ PREM KARMALI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./8576/2026 · 2026-09-15
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26581 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26581 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[ 2026:JHHC:27796] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8576 of 2026 ---- Prem Kumar Karmali @ Prem Karmali, aged about 21 years, s/o Dilip Karmali, Resident of Village – Dundigachi, P.O.-Maganpur, P.S.-Gola, District – Ramgarh.
…. …. Petitioner Versus
The State of Jharkhand
…. …. Opposite Party ----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ----
For the Petitioner
: Mr. Lalan Kr. Singh, Adv.
Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Ayush Kr. Singh, Adv.
For the State
: Mrs. Anuradha Sahay, Addl. P.P.
----
02/Dated: 15th September, 2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. No.55 of 2026 arising out of Rajrappa P.S. Case No.150 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. No.848 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 305(b), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5) & 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed theft of motorcycle. It is next submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and he has been implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement. It is further submitted that charge-sheet has been submitted in this case but none of the witnesses have been examined. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 15.10.2025 as mentioned in para-1 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 24.04.2026 passed in B.A. No.3420 of 2026. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Ramgarh in connection with S.T. No.55 of 2026 arising out of Rajrappa P.S. Case No.150 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. No.848 of 2025 with the condition that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated: 15th September, 2026 Amar/- Uploaded