ZAFAR ALI, AS PARTNER OF J K MINERALS AND DEVELOPERS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cont.(Cvl)/1034/2025 · 2026-04-06
Sanjay Prasad, Sujit Narayan Prasad
Public Interest Litigationbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2658 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2658 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:9675-DB 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No.1034 of 2025
----- Zafar Ali, as Partner of J K Minerals and Developers aged about 30 years old, son of Md. Yusuf, resident of Vilalge-Balumath, (Galib Colony) Post Office- Balumath and Police Station- Balumath, District-Latehar, having registered office at Near Haj House, Flat Behind D.A.V. Kapil Deo Kadru Road, Post Office- Kadru, Police Station- Argora, District-Ranchi
… … … Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Smt. Vipra Bhal, the Secretary, Transport Department, Government of Jharkhand, Dhurwa, Post Office and Police Station – Dhurwa, District- Ranchi.
3. Shri Utkarsh Gupta, the Deputy Commissioner, Latehar, Post Office and Police Station- Latehar, District- Latehar,
4. Mr. Nadeem Saifi, the District Mining Officer, Latehar, Post Office and Police Station- Latehar, District- Latehar,
… … … Opp. Parties
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
---------- For the Petitioner
: Mr. Haider Ali, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Ashutosh Anand, AAG-III
----------
Order No.09/Dated 06th April 2026
1. Reference may be made to the order dated 02nd April 2026.
2.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that the amount to the tune of Rs.28,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Eight Lakhs) has been transferred in the account of the J.K. Minerals and Developers operated by one Zafar Ali.
3.
Learned counsel for the State has further submitted that the vehicle in question has also been returned to the petitioner by the State Authorities after cancellation of the process of auction.
4. This Court, considering the fact that the order has been complied with, is of the view that the there is no need to proceed further.
2026:JHHC:9675-DB 2
5. Accordingly, the instant contempt case being Cont. Case (Civil) No.1034 of 2025 is disposed of.
6. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, also stands
disposed of.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Sanjay Prasad, J.) Date : 06.04.2026 Kamlesh/ Nishant/-