Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2657 (RAJ)

RENU D/O OMPRAKASH W/O LATE SHRI SANDEEP KUMAR v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/2439/2026 · 2026-02-27

Ashok Kumar Jain

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:9303] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2439/2026 Renu D/o Omprakash W/o Late Shri Sandeep Kumar, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village Mukha Ka Bas, Post Bhuda Ka Bas, Tehsil Malsisar, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of School And Bhasha, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Secretary And Commissioner, Panchayati Raj Department, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 4. The District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Bikaner. 5. The Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Sridungargarh. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hanuman Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra K. Takar for Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG Mr. Prateek Saxena for Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 27/02/2026 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: The respondents may kindly be direct allow posting to the petitioner in District Jhunjhunu under widow category as the first preference given by her by transferring from Govt. her posting Senior Secondary School Jetasar, Tehsil Sridungargarh, District Bikaner with all consequential service benefits. [2026:RJ-JP:9303] (2 of 2) [CW-2439/2026] 2. Learned counsel for petitioner has referred order dated 21.02.2022 in SB CWP No.1041/2021 titled as Samiksha Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan and submitted that the issue raised is no more res integra and same has been considered and decided by a Co-ordinate Bench of this court thus the instant writ petition be disposed of on the basis of judgment in case of Samiksha Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra). 3. Mr. Jitendra K. Takar on behalf of Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG and Mr. Prateek Saxena for Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG accepts notice on behalf of respondents. 4. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of in light of Samiksha Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra), if applicable upon facts of the case. The respondents are directed to consider the case of petitioner on the basis of examination of facts if the facts of the case are identical with the ratio laid down in case of Samiksha Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra), then the petitioner be considered for same benefit. 5. The requisite examination be considered within a period of 60 days from date of receipt of copy of the order. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition along with misc. application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /370