Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26568 (AP)

Gokavarapu Venkata Sai Satyanarayana Murthy v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/32844/2023 · 2026-01-05

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010637262023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 32844/2023 Between: 1. GOKAVARAPU VENKATA SAI SATYANARAYANA MURTHY,, S/O SRI SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, HINDU, AGE 59 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O DOOR NO. 10-7, MACHAVARAM - 533 214 AMBAJIPETA MANDAL, DR.B.R.A.KONASEEMA DISTRICT 2. GADE NAGA VENKATA BRAHMA SATISH,, S/O SRI SATYANARAYAN MURTHY, HINDU, AGE 40 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O DOOR NO. 10-13, MACHAVARAM - 533 214, AMBAJIPETA MANDAL, DR.B.R.A.KONASEEMA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPT., A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI - 522 503, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, DR.B.R.A.KONASEEMA DISTRICT AT AMALAPURAM - 533 201 3. THE DISTRICT GRAM PANCHAYAT OFFICER, DR.B.R.A.KONASEEMA DISTRICT AT AMALAPURAM - 533 201 4. THE DIVISIONAL PANCHAYAT OFFICER, AMALAPURAM - 533 201, DR.B.R.A.KONASEEMA DISTRICT 5. THE TAHSILDAR, AMBAJIPETA - 533 214 DR.B.R.A.KONASEEMA DISTRICT 2 6. GRAM PANCHAYAT, MACHAVARAM - 533214 AMBAJIPETA MANDAL, DR.B.R.A.KONASEEMA DISTRICT REP. BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY 7. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DR.B.R.A.KONASEEMA DISTRICT, AMALAPURAM - 533 201 8. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOTHAPETA - 533 223, DR.B.R.A.KONASEEMA DISTRICT 9. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, P.GANNAVARAM CIRCLE, P.GANNAVARAM - 533 214, DR.B.R.A.KONASEEMA DISTRICT 10. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, AMBAJIPETA PS, AMBAJIPETA - 533 214, DR.B.R.A.KONASEEMA DISTRICT. RR 7 TO 10 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER THE ORDER OF THE COURT DT.04.01.2024 VIDE ORDER PASSED IN I.A.NO.1 OF 2024. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in not shifting the accumulated garbage in the streets of the petitioners to the Solid Waste Management Shed situated in Machavaram Village, Ambajipeta Mandal, Dr.B.R.A.Konaseema District as illegal, arbitrary and violative of right to life guaranteed under the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to take immediate steps to remove the garbage in the village and lift the same to the Solid Waste Management Shed in in Machavaram Village, Ambajipeta Mandal, Dr.B.R.A.KonaseemaDistrict regularly and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the authorities to initiate immediate steps for regular lifting of the garbage in the petitioners streets in Machavaram Village, Ambajipeta Mandal, Dr.B.R.A.Konaseema District to the Solid Waste Management Shed situated in the village forthwith, pending disposal of the present Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 3 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to implead the Proposed Respondent Nos. 7 to 10 herein as Party Respondent Nos. 7 to 10 in the present Writ Petition bearing W.P.No 32844 of 2023 and also in the Interlocutory Applications therein and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. N SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 3. N SRIHARI (Standing Counsel for ZPP MPP and GRAM PANCHAYAT) The Court made the following: 4 ORDER: Sri N.Siva Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 06.01.2026. JLV 5 109 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 32844/2023 Date: 06.01.2025. JLV