Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26567 (KAR)

SRI ANAND v. SRI CHINNAPPA REDDY

CRP/572/2026 · 2026-07-03

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33495 CRP No. 572 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 572 OF 2026 (IO) BETWEEN: 1. SRI ANAND S/O SRI HEMA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS. 2. SMT. SUNANDA W/O SRINIVASA REDDY, D/O. SRI HEMA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. 3. SRI RAMACHANDRA A.H., S/O SRI HEMA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS. 4. SRI H. RAGHU S/O SRI HEMA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS. 5. SMT. SHAILAJA W/O NAGABHUSHANA REDDY, D/O. SRI HEMA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS. PLAINTIFFS NOS.1,2,4 & 5 ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SRI RAMACHANDRA, THE PETITIONER NO.3 HEREIN. Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33495 CRP No. 572 of 2026 ALL ARE RESIDING AT ADDE VILLAGE, ARAKERE POST, HESARAGHATTA HOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK, DODDABALLAPUR ROAD, BENGLAURU - 562 163. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI SHANKAR G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI CHINNAPPA REDDY S/O. LATE HANUMANTHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 89 YEARS. 2. SMT. ASHWATHAMMA, D/O. CHINNAPPA REDDY, W/O.CHANDRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS. 3. SRI SANJEEVA REDDY, S/O. CHINNAPPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS. 4. SMT. RATHNAMMA, W/O. SRI VENKATESH REDDY, D/O. CHINNAPPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS. 5. SMT. NAGARATHNAMMA @ NAGAVENI, D/O. CHINNAPPA REDDY, W/O. MUNI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. 6. SRI ASHWATHANARAYANA REDDY S/O. CHINNAPPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS. NOS.1 TO 6 ARE RESIDENTS OF ADDE VISHWANATHAPURA, ARAKERE POST, HESARAGHATTA HOBLI, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33495 CRP No. 572 of 2026 YELAHANKA TALUK, BENGALURU - 562 163. 7. SRI VEERENDRA SHADAKSHARI S/O. SRI S. SHADAKSHARI, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, NO.360, “RAMANASHREE”, 10TH CROSS, SADASHIVANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 080. 8. MR. NOAMAN RAZACK 9. MRS. RABIA RAZAC 10. MRS. BADRUNISSA IRFAN 11. MRS. ALMAS REZWAN, NOS. 8 TO 11 ARE PARTNERS OF M/S. PRESTIGE CONSTRUCTIONS, A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.303, COPPER ARCH, III FLOOR, 83, INFANTRY ROAD, BENGLAURU - 560 001. 12. THE WATCH TOWER BIBLE AND TRACT SOCIETY OF INDIA G-37, RAMAKRISHNA MISSION ROAD, SANTA CRUZ (WEST), MUMBAI - 400 054. 13. M/S. SATTVA HOMES PRIVATE LIMITED, SALARPURIA WINDSOR, NO.3, 4TH FLOOR, ULSOOR ROAD, BENGLAURU - 560 042. REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR. NIRMAL KUMAR BADALIA. 14. SRI HEMA REDDY, SON OF LATE KONDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33495 CRP No. 572 of 2026 RESIDING AT ADDE VILLAGE, ARAKERE POST, HESARAGHATTA HOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK, DODDABALLAPUR ROAD, BENGLAURU - 562 163. 15. MUNINARAYANA REDDY, S/O. LATE NARAPPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, RESIDING AT ADDE VILLAGE, ARAKERE POST, HESARAGHATTA HOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK, DODDABALLAPUR ROAD, BENGALURU - 562 163. 16. MR. A.ABDUL RAFEEQ, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, S/O. ABDUL RAHEEM, RESIDING AT NO.85/1, 1ST FLOOR, K.H.ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 027. 17. M/S. BLUE VALLEY PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. NO.41, NANDIDURGA MAIN ROAD, JAYAMAHALL LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560 046, REP. BY ITS PARTNER,M K. SURYANARAYANARAJU. …RESPONDENTS THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 02.06.2026, PASSED BY THE III ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU, IN OS NO.1742 OF 2019, ON IA NO.4 FILED BY THE DEFENDANT NO.12, UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(d) R/W SEC.151 OF CPC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33495 CRP No. 572 of 2026 ORAL ORDER Office has raised objections with regard to maintainability of CRP in view of Sec.115 of CPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that instead of filing RFA, they have file CRP and hence they seek to withdraw this petition with a liberty to file appropriate petition. Accordingly, the civil revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file an appropriate petition within period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of the order. Registry is directed to return all the documents by keeping the xerox copy. Pending IAs., in this petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE TS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 48