Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.3861 of 2026 Rohan Pradhan ..... Petitioner Represented by Adv. - Shibani Shankar Pradhan -versus- Sri Prashant Lokhande, Chairman CBSE, New Delhi and another ..... Opposite Parties/ Contemnors Mr. T.N. Pattanayak, Adv. CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA ORDER 17.07.2026 Order No. 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode. 2. This Contempt Petition is filed alleging violation of the order dated 10.04.2026 passed by this Court in W.P(C) No.7858 of 2026. 3. Considering the submission made, this Court, by providing a last chance, deems it proper to dispose of the Contempt Petition with a direction to the Opposite Party-Contemnor(s) to comply with the direction of this Court dated 10.04.2026 passed by this Court in W.P(C) No.7858 of 2026, if the same has not been complied with in the meantime, within a period of one week from the date of service of a certified copy of this order by the Petitioner, provided the operation of order/judgment has not been stayed by higher forum and file compliance report before the Registry of this Court within one week thereafter. It is made clear that in the event the order of the Page 2 of 2. Court is not given effect to within the time stipulated hereinabove, the Contemnors shall be asked to appear before this Court and to explain as to why the conduct shall not be construed as an Act of willful and deliberate violation of this Court’s order and why he shall not be proceeded against the Contempt of Court’s Act. Further, it is directed that in the event the order of this Court is not complied, liberty is granted to the Petitioners to revive this contempt. 4. The CONTC is accordingly disposed of. Free copy of this order be handed over to Mr. T.N. Pattanayak, learned counsel for the Contemnors for communication. ( Aditya Kumar Mohapatra ) Judge S.K. Rout