Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:HHC:43796 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Cr.MP(M) No. 1741 of 2026 Decided on 07th October, 2026 _____________________________________________________ Sharif Deen …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …..Respondent _____________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Chirag Bhanu Singh, Judge. 1Whether approved for reporting? _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Kulwant Singh Gill, Advocate. For the respondent/State : Mr. Rajpal Thakur, Additional Advocate General, assisted by ASI Nirmal Singh IO PS Nalagarh, District Solan, HP. _____________________________________________________ Chirag Bhanu Singh, Judge (Oral) In compliance to the order dated 25.09.2026, SDPO, Nalagarh (Supervisory Officer) has filed compliance affidavit, which is taken on record.
2. The accused/petitioner’s wife Gulfasha, who also happens to be the complainant, is present in person. She submits that a fight did take place between the complainant and the petitioner, but due to some misunderstanding she had lodged the complaint. She does not even intend to pursue the complaint/FIR any further.
-2- ( 2026:HHC:43796 )
3. Keeping in view the submissions made by the complainant-wife the investigating agency may take appropriate action, as per law, if so desired.
4. The Supervisory Officer has filed a detailed affidavit, which prima facie suggests that there was dereliction of duty as far as the investigation of the case is concerned.
5. Without going into the merits of the contentions so stated in the affidavit, suffice it to say that the Supervisory Officer shall take appropriate remedial measures and ensure that such laxity may not occur in the future.
6. In view of the above, the interim order dated 08.09.2026 is made absolute.
7. The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
(Chirag Bhanu Singh) 7th October, 2026 Judge (Ritu)