Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26561 (AP)

C.Munirathnam @ Arthali Munirathnam v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/30091/2018 · 2026-02-10

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010629802018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX [3459] PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION No.30091 OF 2018 Between: C. Munirathnam @ Arthali Munirathnam. --- Petitioner and The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District and 3 others. --- Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri Manohar Macharla Counsel for the respondents : G.P. for Home & G.P. for Revenue The Court made the following 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioner, seeking the following relief: “to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 in trying to evict the petitioner from the land in Sy.No.158/2 which is situated at Thambuganipalle Village and Post, Bangarupalyam Mandal, Chittoor District without following due process of law as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially direct the 3rd and 4th respondents not to evict the petitioner from the land in Sy.No.158/2 which is situated at Thambuganipalle Village and Post, Bangarupalyam Mandal,Chittoor District and pass …………….” 2. On 09.02.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner. Today, when the matter is called, none appeared for the petitioner. 3. On the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on written instructions, dated 10.07.2026, submits that the respondent authorities have not interfered with the subject land of the petitioner. The learned Assistant Government Pleader further submits that if the land of the petitioner is required in the future, they will conduct an enquiry, follow due procedure of law by giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 3 4. In view of the aforesaid submission, no further orders are required in this Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date:11.02.2026 DSH