Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2656 (AP)

ANGADI PRAMILA v. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER

WP/14494/2026 · 2026-05-13

Balaji Medamalli, Y Lakshmana Rao

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010280702026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3585] THURSDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI WRIT PETITION NO: 14494/2026 Between: 1. ANGADI PRAMILA, W/O GOWTHAM BRUSLI AGED ABOUT 24YRS, OCC HOUSEHOLD R/O H.NO.10-36, MURUKONDAPADU, STUVARTPURAM, BAPATIA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VEDULLAPALLI POLICE STATION BAPATLA DISTRICT -522317 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KARLAPALEM POLICE STATION BAPATLA DISTRICT-522111 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BAPATLA, BAPATLA DISTRICT -522101 4. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR DISTRICT -522237 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Habeas Corpus to direct the respondent Nos.1 and 2 and 3 to produce the detenue named Angadi Gowtham @ Brush aged about 27yrs, R/o H.No.10-36, Murukondapadu, Stuvartapuram, Bapatla Mandal, Bapatla District before this Hon’ble court and set him at liberty in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following: ORDER:- (Per Hon’ble Sri Dr.Justice Y. Lakshmana Rao) Heard Sri P.Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri J.Krishna Praneeth, learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondents. Perused the material on record. 2. Sri P.Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on 11.05.2026 at about 11:00 pm, the 1st respondent Police forcibly took the custody of the husband of the petitioner herein and since then he has been confined to detention illegally. He further submits that the respondent-Police demanding an amount of Rs.17,00,000/- and if the amount is not paid, they would implicate the petitioner in false N.D.P.S. cases. 3. Sri J.Krishna Praneeth, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of respondents attached to the office of the learned Advocate General submits that the petitioner has been arraigned as accused in Crime No.23 of 2026 at Vedullapalli Police Station, for the alleged offences punishable under Section 318(4), 308(2) read with 3(5) of ‘the B.N.S’ and the petitioner was produced as an accused before the Jurisdictional Magistrate and orders of judicial custody are awaited. 4. In view of the above submissions of learned Assistant Government Pleader, this Court is of the view that no further orders are required to be passed inasmuch as the petitioner is required to work out his remedy by way of filing an application before the jurisdictional Magistrate seeking for his enlargement on bail. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________ DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO _____________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 14.05.2026 M K K 06 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI WRIT PETITION No: 14494 of 2026 Date: 14.05.2026 M K K