Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26559 (PNJ)

GURSAHIB SINGH ALIAS SAHIB SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/24188/2026 · 2026-07-07

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-24188-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 321 CRM-M-24188-2026 Date of decision: 7th July, 2026 Gursahib Singh @ Sahib Singh and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Jagpal Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Durgesh Garg, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Ms. Gurpreet Kaur, Advocate for respondent No.2. *** MANISHA BATRA, J (ORAL):- The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short-‘BNSS’) for quashing of DDR No. 41 dated 03.06.2021 registered under Sections 341, 323, 506, 34, 279 and 201 of IPC at Police Station Khanouri, in case arising out of FIR No. 41 dated 03.06.2021 registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 148 and 149 of IPC (Section 326 of IPC added later on) along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 17.02.2026 (Annexure P-4) arrived at between the parties. 2. This Court vide order dated 05.05.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.07.07 17:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-24188-2026 -2- learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Moonak, and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Judge has submitted report dated 30.05.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and DDR No. 41 dated 03.06.2021 registered under Sections 341, 323, 506, 34, 279 and 201 of IPC at Police Station Khanouri, in case arising out of FIR No. 41 dated 03.06.2021 registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 148 and 149 of IPC (Section 326 of IPC added later on) and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 17.02.2026(Annexure P-4) are quashed qua the petitioners. [MANISHA BATRA] JUDGE 7th July, 2026 Parveen Sharma 1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes / No 2. Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.07.07 17:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document