M/L574 03.07.2026 Bpg. C.R.M. (M) 672 of 2026 With CRAN 1 of 2026 Anowar Hossain & Anr. Versus The State of West Bengal Mr. Mazhar Hossain Chowdhury. …for the petitioners. Ms. Ananya Chakraborty. …for the State. In Re: CRAN 1 of 2026 Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that for reasons beyond his control he could not be present on the date when the bail application was called. In view of the reasons assigned in the application, I find that the same are just and sufficient. Accordingly, the order dated 01.04.2026 is hereby recalled. The bail application is restored to its original file and number. Thus, CRAN 1 of 2026 is allowed. CRM(M) 672 of 2026 Petitioners submit that they are in custody for more than a year and there is no possibility of the trial concluding in near future, as such, the petitioners may be released on bail. 2 Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail. I have considered the merits of the case including the gravity of the offence. Having regard to the same, I am of the opinion that this is not a fit case to release the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioners is rejected. Learned trial court would expedite the process of trial. Thus, CRM(M)672 of 2026 is dismissed. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)