2026:JHHC:28175 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8612 of 2026 Paramjit Bhuinya @Amarjit Bhuinya aged about 25 years, Son of Ramnath Ram @ Ramnath Bhuinya, Resident of Village- Nawada Mashjit Tola, P.O- & P.S.- Garhwa, Dist.-Garhwa, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- 06/17.09.2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner is present. 2. Learned counsel for the opposite party- State Mr. Bishambhar Shastri, APP, is also present. 3. Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Garhwa P.S. Case No.30 of 2026 registered under sections 80, 85 and 3 (5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, now pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Garhwa. 5. . Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 11.01.2026 and charge has been framed on 05.05.2026 for alleged offence under Sections 80/3(5) and 85/3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner happens to be the husband of the deceased. The learned counsel submits that the deceased died in her matrimonial home within seven years of marriage, but she had committed suicide. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that since the petitioner used to continuously talk to other persons over mobile, due to which the deceased remained depressed and she committed suicide. 7. Learned counsel for the state has opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that there is direct allegation against the petitioner of demand of dowry, cruelty and assault and the petitioner also has numerous criminal antecedents. Further, the charge has been framed under Sections 80/3(5) and 85/3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 2026:JHHC:28175 2 and not under Section 108 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He submits that it is not a case of suicide. 8. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the direct allegation of demand of dowry and torture by the petitioner, who happens to be the husband of the deceased, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and hence, this bail application is rejected. 9. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:17.09.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:19.09.2026