Smt. Amavarapu Ramanamma v. The Government of Andhra Pradssh
WP/8223/2014 · 2026-02-09
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26547 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26547 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
::1::
APHC010639592014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 8223/2014 Between:
1. SMT. AMAVARAPU RAMANAMMA,, W/O.
RAGHURAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCC. SARPANCH OF VINNAMALA VILLAGE AND GRAMPANCHAYAT, NAIDUPETA MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADSSH, REP. BY ITS PRL SECRETARY, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT NELLORE, -
3. THE COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENTS, NAMPALLY, BOGGULAKUNTA, ABIDS, HYDERABAD. 4. THE KALAHASTHEESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, LINGAMALA VILLAGE, NAIDUPETA MANDAL SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. ATAPAKA VENKATESWARALU, S/O. LATE
::2::
PARDHASARADHI SETTY, AGED 65 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO. N-20, NAINAPPA MAISTRY STREET, PARK TOWN, CHENNAI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the official respondents in failing to take action against the 5th respondent pursuant to the orders passed in OA No. 36/2002 and OA No. 66/2006, dated 04.11.2006 for eviction under HR & CE Act is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 4 to take immediate action for eviction of the 5th respondent in occupation of the grampanchayat land of an extent of Ac. 1.00 of land in Sy No. 92/1C and 92-2B situated at Vinnamala Village and Grampanchayat of Nellore District and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RAVIKUMAR MATHANGI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
2. T VENU GOPAL SC FOR ENDOWMENTS (RAYALASEEMA REGION)
3. V T M PRASAD
4. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
5. SIDDARTH C B
::3::
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
W.P.No.8223 of 2014 This Court made the following ORDER:
No representation for the petitioner on 31.07.2024, 06.02.2026 and even today when the matter is posted under the caption “for dismissal” there is no representation for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner through this writ petition seeking for eviction of unofficial respondent No.5 in respect of the subject property pursuant to the orders in O.A.No.36/2002 and O.A.No.66/2006, wherein the tribunal passed orders in O.A directing the concerned authorities to evict the un-official respondent No.5 herein and party to the order dated 04.11.2006.
Therefore, the Respondent Authorities hereby directed to verify pursuant to the orders of the Tribunal in O.A.No.36/2002 and O.A.No.66/2006, dated 04.11.2006, whether the unofficial Respondent herein has already got evicted or not in terms of the orders of the Tribunal. If the Tribunal specifically directed for eviction of the unofficial Respondent who is party to the proceedings before the Tribunal,
::4::
the Respondent Nos.3 and 4 herein shall take appropriate action in accordance with law. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed. No costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. _________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J
DT: 10.02.2026 krk
::5::
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
W.P.No.8223 of 2014
DT: 10.02.2026 krk
82