Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26542 (JHR)

KUSHAL PODDAR ALIAS KUSHAL KUMAR PODDAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8561/2026 · 2026-09-15

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:27790] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8561 of 2026 ---- Kushal Poddar @ Kushal Kumar Poddar aged about 20 years, S/o Prakash Poddar @ Jai Prakash Poddar, resident of Village – Charki Pahari P.O. – Patrodih, P.S. – Karmatanr, Dist.-Jamtara, Jharkhand – 815352. …. …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …. …. Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Shiv Prasad, Adv. Mr. Sushil Kr. Verma, Adv. Mr. Arvind Prakash Malakar, Adv. For the State : Mr. Azeemuddin, Addl. P.P. ---- 02/Dated: 15th September, 2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Karmatanr P.S. Case No.56 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 331(4) and 305 of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-accused persons broke the back door of the house of the informant and committed theft of all articles from her house. It is then submitted that is the counter blast case of Karmatanr Case No.52 of 2026 lodged by the co-accused namely Jay Prakash Poddar. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. On account of Animosity this false case been lodged. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 30.07.2026 as mentioned in para-1 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-12 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamtara in connection with Karmatanr P.S. Case No.56 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated: 15th September, 2026 Amar/- Uploaded