CRM-M-27522-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 207(ii) AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-27522-2026 Date of decision: 07.07.2026 JAAN MOHAMMAD ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr. Salman Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vijay Kumar, AAG, Haryana. **** H.S.GREWAL,J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.161 dated 24.10.2025, registered under Sections 115, 351(3), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 25(1-B)(a) of the Arms Act, 1959, at Police Station Bichhor, District Nuh. 2. This Court, vide order dated 15.05.2026, had directed the petitioner to appear before the SHO/Investigating Officer and join investigation and in the event of his arrest, he was ordered to be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating Officer, subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 482(2) of the BNSS (erstwhile Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.). 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 15.05.2026, passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined and cooperated with the investigation. 4. Status report by way of an affidavit of Dinesh Kumar, HPS, Deputy RENU RAWAT 2026.07.07 16.58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-27522-2026 2 Superintendent of Police, Punhana has been filed in the Court today and the same is taken on record. Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is not required for further custodial interrogation. 5. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the petition is allowed and the interim order dated 15.05.2026 is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. 6. However, it is clarified that the investigating authority on addition of an offence or offences may not proceed to arrest the accused/petitioner, but for arresting the accused/petitioner on such addition of offence or offences it needs to obtain an order to arrest the accused/petitioners from the Court which had granted the bail in view of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Sumit Vs State of U.P. and Another, Criminal Appeal No. 830 of 2026, decided on 09.02.2026. 7. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 07.07.2026 (H.S.GREWAL) renu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.07.07 16.58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh