Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26530 (AP)

PVR STRUCTURES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. G. SAI PRASAD

CC/3657/2025 · 2026-03-22

T C D Sekhar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010633482025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3657/2025 Between: 1. PVR STRUCTURES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, MANAGING DIRECTOR P SRIHARSHA, S/O VEERAJU, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, D.NO.1838, BOKKAVARI STREET, MANDAPETA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT-533308. ...PETITIONER AND 1. G SAI PRASAD, PRINCIPLE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT IRRIGATION AND CAD WATER RESOURCES RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SHRI SAGILI SHAN MOHAN I A S, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, (IRRIGATION WING) KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. SRI K GOPINATH, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, DOWLAISWARAM,EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. DR MAHESH KUMAR RAVIRALA I A S, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR (IRRIGATION WING) DR B R AMBEDKAR 2 KONASEEMA DISTRICT 6. V RAMKRISHNA, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT GODAVARI EASTERN DIVISION RAMACHANDRAPURAM DR B R AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents U/s. 10 to 12 of contempts of Court Acts for willful and deliberate violation of Final order passed in WP No 1822/2025 dated 23.07.2025 by Learned Single Judge and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ANNAMNEEDI BALAKRISHNA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI 2. . 3 The Court made the following order: When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that, the order under contempt is complied with. In the circumstances, the present contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Dt.23.03.2026 SCH 4 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR C.C.No.3657 OF 2025 Date: 23.03.2026 SCH