[2026:RJ-JP:11210] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 8163/2025 Ravi Kumar Son Of Shree Krishan Lal, Resident Of Villige Pipren, Tehasil Suratgarh, District Shreeganganagar, Raj. ----Accused-Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. Prem Singh Son Of Chandra Singh, Resident Of Ward No.12, Kasali, Tehsil Dhod, District Sikar, Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saurabh Tiwari, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 16/03/2026 1. The instant Criminal Misc. Petition under Section 528 of BNSS has been filed on behalf of the petitioner assailing the orders dated 03.11.2025 and 21.11.2025 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Dhod, District Sikar in Criminal Case (CIS) No.14/2022. By the order dated 03.11.2025, bail bonds of the petitioner were forfeited and warrant of arrest was issued against him and proceedings under Section 446 of Cr.P.C. (Section 491 of BNSS) was also ordered to be initiated against the petitioner. By the order dated 21.11.2025, the petitioner was declared absconder and standing arrest warrant was issued against him. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only on the ground of non-appearance of the petitioner for one day, bail bonds of the petitioner were forfeited on 03.11.2025 and warrant of [2026:RJ-JP:11210] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-8163/2025] arrest was issued to ensure his presence. He further submits that the petitioner is facing criminal trial for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. He submits that on account of unavoidable circumstances, petitioner could not appear before the learned trial Court, therefore, his bail bonds were forfeited and he was summoned through warrant of arrest and by the subsequent order, the trial Court declared the petitioner as absconder and also issued standing arrest warrant against him. Counsel submits that petitioner is ready to pay the fine amount under Section 446 Cr.P.C and he also undertakes that in future the petitioner will attend the Court proceedings on each and every date. 3. I have considered the submissions. 4. Considering overall facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, so also considering the fact that only on a one day neither petitioner nor his advocate could appear before the learned trial Court and bail bonds of the petitioner were forfeited, this petition is disposed of with a direction that petitioner shall appear before the trial Court on or before 02.04.2026 and submit bail bonds to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. Upon surrender and furnishing bail bonds, learned trial Court shall accept the same, if fine amount under Section 446 Cr.P.C. is deposited by the accused-petitioner. Till 02.04.2026, the warrant of arrest issued against the petitioner shall be kept in abeyance. It is made clear that if the petitioner fails to surrender and deposit the fine amount before the trial Court on or before 02.04.2026, this order shall lose its efficacy. [2026:RJ-JP:11210] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-8163/2025] 5. With the aforesaid directions, this Criminal Misc. Petition is disposed of. 6. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/52