Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26520 (PNJ)

PAWAN KUMAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/33443/2026 · 2026-07-06

Sanjay Vashisth

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

106 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-33443-2026 DECIDED ON: 06.07.2026 PAWAN KUMAR .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB .....RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH. Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Manjinder Singh Bhullar, DAG, Punjab. SANJAY VASHISTH , J (ORAL) 1. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner, seeking grant of anticipatory bail, in case, FIR No.0154, dated 26.05.2026, under Sections 316(2) of BNS (corresponding to section 406 of IPC), registered at Police Station Kalan Wali, Dabwali, District Sirsa. 2. After going through the office note dated 04.07.2026, facts mentioned therein have been examined with reference to the present petition and it is found that FIR in question has been registered in Dabwali, District Sirsa, and bail application of the petitioner has already been dismissed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sirsa (Haryana), vide order dated 04.06.2026 (Annexure P-2). However, as per the memo of parties and the supporting affidavit appended with the present petition, petitioner has inadvertently impleaded “State of Punjab” as respondent, instead of “State of Haryana”. 3. In view of the aforesaid, present petition is disposed of, with the observation that it shall be open for the petitioner to file a fresh petition with the correct particulars, if so advised. 4. Accordingly, present petition stands disposed of. (SANJAY VASHISTH) 06.07.2026 JUDGE Lavisha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No LAVISHA 2026.07.06 18:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC, Chandigarh