Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2652 (RAJ)

SYED MOHD. HUSSAIN S/O SHRI SYED MAHMUD ALI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/261/2021 · 2026-02-26

Sangeeta Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:8895] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 261/2021 Syed Mohd. Hussain S/o Shri Syed Mahmud Ali, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Ward No. 28, Jama Masjid, Churu (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Home Department, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Smt. Shabana Bano D/o Shri Altaf Hussain Alias Munshi, R/o Ward No. 08 Lakshmangarh, Sikar. 3. Mohd. Hussain S/o Shri Mahmud Ali, R/o Ward No. 28 Jama Masjid Ke Paas, Churu Rajasthan. 4. Mahmud Ali Alias Mohd. Ali S/o Shri Mohd. Usman, R/o Ward No. 28 Jama Masjid Ke Paas, Churu Rajasthan. 5. Aleh Hasan S/o Shri Mohd. Hussain, R/o Ward No. 28 Jama Masjid Ke Paas, Churu Rajasthan. 6. Rehan Mustafa S/o Shri Mahmud Ali, R/o Ward No. 28 Jama Masjid Ke Paas, Churu Rajasthan. 7. Mujaffar Hussain S/o Shri Mahmud Ali, R/o Ward No. 28 Jama Masjid Ke Paas, Churu Rajasthan. 8. Hameeda Bano W/o Shri Mahmud Ali, R/o Ward No. 28 Jama Masjid Ke Paas, Churu Rajasthan. 9. Shrikishan Verma S/o Rajendra Verma, R/o Ward No. 28 Jama Masjid Ke Paas, Churu Rajasthan. 10. Iliyas Ali S/o Shri Mohammad Abbas, R/o Ward No. 18, Near Muslim Musaafirkhaana, Ramgarh Sethan, District Sikar Rajasthan. 11. Mohammad Imran S/o Shri Mohammad Abbas, R/o Ward No. 18, Near Muslim Musaafirkhaana, Ramgarh Sethan, District Sikar Rajasthan. 12. Smt. Shaehnaz Bano W/o Shri Mohammad Abbas, R/o Ward No. 18, Near Muslim Musaafirkhaana, Ramgarh Sethan, District Sikar Rajasthan. ----Respondents [2026:RJ-JP:8895] (2 of 2) [CRLW-261/2021] For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, P.P. HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 26/02/2026 1. No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner even in the second round. 2. In view of the above, the present criminal writ petition is dismissed in default. 3. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stands disposed of. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J Shivani/10