Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26518 (JHR)

CHHOTU PASWAN @ HIRA PASWAN @ HIRA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./7092/2026 · 2026-09-17

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:28199] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.7092 of 2026 ------ Chhotu Paswan @ Hira Paswan @ Hira age 22 years, Son of Subodh Paswan, Resident of Village – Paltanganj, P.O. – Taljhari, P.S. – Taljhari, District- Sahibganj, State- Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sabyasanchi, Advocate For the State : Mr. Tarun Kumar, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.04 Dated-17-09-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Borio (J) P.S. Case No.92 of 2023 (S.T. No.311 of 2023) registered for the offences punishable under Section 147, 148, 149, 307, 326 and 384 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was member of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of the common object of the assembly, attempted to murder Sanjeet Mandal by firing upon him. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that the allegation of firing is upon the co-accused Raju Paswan, who has already been admitted to bail by a co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 23.10.2024 passed in B.A. No.9129 of 2024. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by a co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 23.01.2024 passed in B.A. No.11683 of 2023. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 08.05.2026 as has been mentioned in para- 14 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Sahibganj in connection with Borio (J) P.S. Case No.92 of 2023 (S.T. No.311 of 2023) with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-17.09.2026-Animesh/