Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26509 (PAT)

Jaggu Yadav @ Rajdev Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./21790/2026 · 2026-07-21

Sandeep Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21790 of 2026 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14634 of 2009 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-104 Year-2003 Thana- BARACHATTI District- Gaya ====================================================== Jaggu Yadav @ Rajdev Yadav S/O Late Sri Ramdev Yadav Resident of Village- Ganhar, P.S- Magadh University, Distt.- Gaya, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rampravesh Nath Tiwari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 21-07-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. 2. The present application has been filed by the petitioner seeking modification of the order dated 20.05.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 14634 of 2009, whereby this Court was pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court in connection with Barachatti (Mohanpur) P.S. Case No. 104 of 2003 with a direction that one of the sureties shall be executed by the father of the petitioner on due identification by the Court below. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the father of the petitioner, who was Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21790 of 2026(2) dt.21-07-2026 2/2 directed to stand as one of the bailors, has since died. It is, therefore, prayed that the condition requiring the father of the petitioner to furnish bail bond may kindly be modified and the wife of the petitioner may be permitted to stand as one of the bailors in his place. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the reason stated in the present application, the order dated 20.05.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 14634 of 2009 stands modified to the extent that, in place of the father of the petitioner, the wife of the petitioner shall be permitted to furnish bail bond as one of the bailors, subject to her due identification and satisfaction of the court below. 5. The other terms and conditions incorporated in the order dated 20.05.2009 shall remain unchanged. 6. The present modification application stands allowed to the aforesaid extent. Shishir/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T