Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26508 (KAR)

SMT PREMAMMA v. SRI G DAYALU

RP/306/2024 · 2026-07-06

Ravi V Hosmani

Review Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33930 RP No. 306 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REVIEW PETITION NO. 306 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. PREMAMMA W/O LATE S.R. CHOWDAPPA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS 2. SMT. RENUKA D/O LATE S.R. CHOWDAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS 3. SMT. VIJAYALAKSHMI D/O LATE P.M. RAMSWAMY AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 4. SMT. LAKSHMI C D/O LATE S.R. CHOWDAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 5. SRI. LAKSHMAN MURTHY S/O LATE S.R. CHOWDAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 6. SRI. PRABHAKAR S.C, S/O LATE S.R. CHOWDAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS 7. SRI. PREMKUMAR S/O LATE S.R. CHOWDAPPA Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33930 RP No. 306 of 2024 AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS 8. SRI. S.R. MUNICHOWDAPPA S/O RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS 9. SRI. S.R. MUNIYAPPA S/O PAMPAIAH AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS PETITIONERS NO.1 TO 9 ARE RESIDING AT NO. 85, RAMAIAH LAYOUT, SUDDAGUNTE PALYA, DHARMARAM COLLEGE POST BENGALURU - 560 029. 10. SMT. PARVATHAMMA W/O LATE S.R. VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS 11. SMT. GAYATHI D/O LATE S.R. VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 12. SRI. SRIKANTHA S.V, S/O LATE S.R. VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS PETITIONER NO.10 TO 12 ARE RESIDING AT NO. 14/50 CHOWDESHWARI NILAYA, 1ST CROSS RAMAIAH LAYOUT, S.G. PALYA NEAR CHOWDESHWARI TEMPLE DRC POST, BENGALURU - 560 029. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33930 RP No. 306 of 2024 PETITIONER NO.5 IS THE GPA HOLDER FOR PETITIONER NO.1 TO 4, AND 6 TO 12. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAHUL S. REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. G. DAYALU S/O LATE V. GOVINDARAJU AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT NO. 217, 1ST MAIN SECTOR 6, HSR LAYOUT BENGALURU - 560 102. 2. SRI. MUKESH M S/O LATE MADANLAL JAIN AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT NO. 170, 1ST CROSS HOSUR MAIN ROAD RUPENA AGRAHARA BENGALURU - 560 068. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SANJAY H SETHIYA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS REVIEW PETITION UNDER SECTION 114 R/W ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC PRAYING TO REVIEW THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 20/06/2024 IN M.F.A. NO. 1928/2024 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33930 RP No. 306 of 2024 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for petitioners has filed a Memo stating that petition has become infructuous. 2. Taking Memo on record, Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 47