SMT. ANUSUAYAMMA v. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
WP/16840/2026 · 2026-07-01
E S Indiresh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26503 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26503 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32719 WP No. 16840 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 16840 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
SMT. ANUSUYAMMA, W/O LATE ANANDAPPA, DAUGHTER IN LAW OF LATE CHIKKAMUNISHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT CHIKKABANNAHALLI VILLAGE, BIDARHALLI HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 067. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. MANJUNATH, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, AT BENGALURU - 560 009.
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, KANDAYA BHAVANA, BANGALORE - 560 009.
3.
THE TAHSILDAR, BANGALORE EAST TALUK (ADDL), K.R.PURAM, BANGALORE - 560 036.
Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32719 WP No. 16840 of 2026
4.
SMT. LAKSHMAMMA, W/O MR. JAYANNA, D/O LATE DODDAMUNISHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT NO.160/A, THARALU VILLAGE, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 082.
5.
SMT. SHANTHAMMA, W/O SRI. JAYARAMAPPA, D/O LATE SRI. DODDAMUNISHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT NO.3/7, JURUR, ULLMARANAPALLI, GUMMALAPURAM, KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT, TAMILNADU - 635 118.
6.
SMT. PARVATHAMMA, W/O LATE SRI. MUNURAMIAH, D/O LATE SRI. DODDAMUNISHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/AT NO.160/A, THARALU VILLAGE, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 082.
7.
SMT. LALITHA. M., W/O LATE KRISHNAPPA, D/O LATE SRI. DODDAMUNISHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NO.24/3, 14TH CROSS, HOYSALA NAGARA, SUNKADAKATTE, BENGALURU - 560 091.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32719 WP No. 16840 of 2026
8.
SRI. MANJUNATHA, S/O LATE SRI. DODDAMUNISHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT NO.160/A, THARALU VILLAGE, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 082. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SURAJ SAMPATH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI.B.K.SAMPATH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR C/R8 IN CP 11470/26;
SRI.SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP FOR R1 - R3)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO WRIT CERTIORARI OR ANY WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION, QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER FOUND AT ANNEXURE-G, PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 HEREIN, IN RP. NO.94/2025 DATED 24/04/2026 AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
Learned HCGP accepts notice for respondents No.1 to
3.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32719 WP No. 16840 of 2026
2.
Learned counsel Sri. Suraj Sampath, for learned counsel Sri. B.K. Sampath Kumar entered appearance as caveator/respondent No.8.
3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
4. In this Writ Petition, petitioner is assailing the
order dated 24.04.2026 (Annexure -G) passed by respondent No. 1.
5. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on careful consideration of the same would indicate that the entry has been made based on a registered instrument, dated 27.08.2007. In that view of the matter, as the suit in O.S. No. 632 of 2025 is pending consideration before the competent civil court filed by the petitioner herein, I am of the view that, no interference be called for in this petition. However, it is open for the petitioner herein to approach the competent authorities after the conclusion of
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32719 WP No. 16840 of 2026
the suit wherein the rights of the parties will be cristalised in OS No. 632 of 2025.
With this observation Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
BVK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32