Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 265 (PNJ)

DAVINDER SINGH v. PUNJAB STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION AND OTHERS

CWP/4020/2026 · 2026-03-27

Kuldeep Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 101 CWP-4020-2026 Date of Decision : March 27, 2026 DAVINDER SINGH -PETITIONER V/S PUNJAB STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION AND OTHERS -RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Ms. Shivangi Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Arihant Goyal, Advocate, with Mr. Saurav Saini, Advocate for the respondents No.3 and 4. *** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL) 1. On 11.02.2026, this Court had passed the following order:- “1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner’s sole grievance pertains to the non-supply of information sought at Point No.4 of the application (Annexure P- 1). It is contended that the State Information Commissioner, vide the impugned order dated 19.12.2019, has erroneously observed that the aforesaid information is available on the website. However, the link furnished to the petitioner is non-functional, and the said information is not accessible on the website. 2. For the limited purpose of ascertaining whether the petitioner has, in fact, been supplied with the information sought at Point No.4, notice be issued to the respondents No.2 to 4 only at this stage. 3. Dasti also. 4. List on 09.03.2026 in the urgent list.” 2. Today, learned counsel appearing for the respondents No.3 and 4 has filed a written statement dated 22.03.2026, accompanied by DEVINDER YADAV 2026.03.27 14:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-4020-2026 2 Annexures R-3/1 to R-3/5, which is taken on record. A copy of the written statement has also been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. After perusing the written statement and on instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner purveys satisfaction that the desired information has been supplied and, therefore, no cause of action survives for adjudication in the instant writ petition. 4. In view of the above, no further directions are required to be passed, and the instant writ petition is closed. 5. Disposed of accordingly. (KULDEEP TIWARI) March 27, 2026 JUDGE devinder Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No DEVINDER YADAV 2026.03.27 14:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment