SUNIL KUMAR MEHTA @ SUNIL MEHTA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./8696/2026 · 2026-09-17
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26499 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26499 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:28091 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 8696 of 2026
------ Sunil Kumar Mehta @ Sunil Mehta, aged about 20 years, Son of Sambhu Prasad Mehta, Resident of Village Kurha, P.O. Ichak, P.S. Ichak, District- Hazaribag. .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Pradeep Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mrs. Priya Shrestha, Spl. P.P.
------
Order No:-02 Dated:-17-09-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Ichak P.S. Case No. 122 of 2026, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 21(a)/22(a)/29 of N.D.P.S. Act, 1985.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in sale of brown sugar which is also known as heroin. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the seized heroin was in small quantity. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 14.07.2026, as mentioned in para 22 of this bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in para 21 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to cooperate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the
court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, N.D.P.S. Act, Hazaribagh in connection with Ichak P. S. case no. 122 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 17.09.2026 Vedanti/