Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26498 (PNJ)

RAJBIR SINGH v. DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER 2ND FLOOR MINI SECRETARIAT

CWP/12972/2026 · 2026-07-06

Jagmohan Bansal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

147 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12972-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.07.2026 RAJBIR SINGH ...Petitioner Versus DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER 2ND FLOOR MINI SECRETARIAT AND OTHERS …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present : Ms. Maninee, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, A.A.G., Haryana. Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Akash Choudhary, Advocate and Mr. Saksham Kaushik, Advocate for respondent No.4 JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking a direction to the respondents to pay compensation with respect to structure situated in Village Kadipur. 2. From the perusal of the record, it is evident that the matter with respect to compensation is pending before the Arbitrator. The respondents have assessed the amount of compensation. GURPREET KAUR 2026.07.07 09:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-12972-2026 (O&M) -2- 3. The petitioner is claiming that the said amount has not been released. 4. The petitioner has an efficacious alternative remedy of filing an appropriate application before the Arbitrator. 5. Faced with this, learned counsel for the petitioner expressed her inability to controvert the aforesaid factual and legal position. 6. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail alternative remedy. 7. Pending Misc. Application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. July 06, 2026 [JAGMOHAN BANSAL] gurpreet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No GURPREET KAUR 2026.07.07 09:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document