Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26496 (PAT)

Rana Pratap Choudhary v. The State of Bihar

/17954/2026 · 2026-07-14

Sandeep Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17954 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-377 Year-2025 Thana- BIHIA District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Rana Pratap Choudhary S/o Late Ram Lal Choudhary R/O Village and P.O Bara Kharauni, P.S-Bihiya, District-Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Arun Kumar Sinha S/o Late Paras Nath Sinha R/o vill - Bara Kharauni, P.S.- Bihiya, Distt.- Bhojpur 3. Sahadev Pandey S/o Rameshwar Pandey R/o vill - Bara Kharauni, P.S.- Bihiya, Distt.- Bhojpur 4. Saurav Kumar Sinha @ Vikash Kumar Sinha S/o Ravi Ranjan Verma R/o vill - Bara Kharauni, P.S.- Bihiya, Distt.- Bhojpur ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Jay Shankar Prasad Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 14-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. This application has been filed for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the opposite party nos. 2 to 4 by the learned District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur, Ara, vide order dated 12.01.2026 passed in A.B.P. No.3236 of 2025 and 3260 of 2025, in connection with Bihiyan P.S. Case No.377 of 2025 registered for the offence under sections 103(1), 105 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17954 of 2026(2) dt.14-07-2026 2/2 submitted that after grant of bail, the opposite party nos. 2 to 4 are threatening the petitioner and in this regard the petitioner has filed an application and on the basis of the said application, an enquiry is being conducted by the concerned Superintendent of Police. 4. In view of the above, this application is dismissed with a liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh application for cancellation bail before the Court below if in the enquiry it comes that the petitioner was being threatened by the opposite party nos. 2 to 4 after being granted bail. pallavi/ pawan (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T