Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26493 (AP)

Devuluri Srinivasulu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/30486/2018 · 2026-02-08

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010635112018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 30486/2018 Between: 1. DEVULURI SRINIVASULU, S/O. RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC.COOLIE R/O. GODAVALURU VILLAGE, KONDAPURAM MANDAL, S.P.S.R. NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIATE BUILDING, VELAGAPURI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE THAHASILDAR, KONDAPURAM MANDAL, S.P.S.R. NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE DIVISIONAL SURVEYOR, OFFICE OF RDO, KAVALI, S.P.S.R. NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE SHO, PS. KONDAPURAM, KONDAPURAM MANDAL, S.P.S.R. NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of respondent No.2 and 3 in not conducting survey of the petitioner land admeasuring Ac. 1-75 cents in Sy. No. 103-3-3 of Godavaluru Village, Kondapuram Mandal Nellore District by 2 JS, J W.P.No.30486/2018 taking aid of 4th respondent as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to conduct survey and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct ihe respondents to conduct survey of the lands belonging to the petitioner situated in Sy. No. 103-3-3 tdmeasuring Ac. 1-75 cents of ( iodavaluru Village, Kondapuram Mandal, S.P.S.R. N&lore District pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P RAVI KIRAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3 JS, J W.P.No.30486/2018 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 09.02.2026 rsd 4 JS, J W.P.No.30486/2018 2 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 30486/2018 Date: 09.02.2026 rsd