1 / 2 CGHC010327542021 2026:CGHC:29511 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5080 of 2021 1 - Soni Jaiswal (Died And Deleted) As Per Honble Court Order Dated 05-08- 2025 2 - Jackie Das Manikpuri S/o Phool Das Manikpuri, Aged About 30 Years R/o Ganesh Nagar, Naya Para, Police Station Sirgitti, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners versus 1 - South Eastern Central Railway Through General Manager, South Eastern Central Railway, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 2 - Senior Divisional Engineer, South Eastern Central Railway, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 3 - Divisional Engineer, South Eastern Central Railway, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - G. K Bera, Engineer, Senior Section, South Eastern Central Railway, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5 - Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Sumit Singh Rathore, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Ramakant Mishra, Advocate ALFIZA BAIG Digitally signed by ALFIZA BAIG Date: 2026.07.14 14:08:55 +0530 2 / 2 S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 13.07.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are doing their business on the land of respondent- railways along with other similar vendors. He further submits that the petitioner is apprehending that he may be removed from the place where he is doing his business and hence, filed this petition. 2. Considering the facts as pleaded therein, this Court vide order dated 05.01.2022 granted interim relief in favor of petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that pursuant to the observation made by this Court during the course of hearing, he has sought instructions and according to the instructions, as of now, the respondents are not taking any steps for removing the petitioner from the place where he is doing his business. He also submits that the action at that time might have taken when the petitioner or other vendors have made an attempt to encroach the road, obstructed the free movement of the traffic. He submits that as of now, there is no such situation, therefore, no action will be taken against the petitioners, as per the instructions received by him today. 4. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the respondents nothing survives in this writ petition for adjudication. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of on the submission made by counsel for the respondent-railways. Certified copy as per rules. sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Alfiza