121 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-19549-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 06.07.2026 SHAUNAK HARDY ..Petitioner Versus BAR COUNCIL OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA & ORS. ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. J.S. Mehndiratta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Edward Augustine George, Advocate Mr. Shubham Malik, Advocate Ms. Tanveen Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suvir Sidhu, Advocate Mr. Naman Gumker, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J. (Oral) 1. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for directing the respondent No.3 to allow the petitioner to undertake the supplementary exams scheduled to be conducted in July, 2026 for the term of 2nd Semester of 1st year, B.A., L.L.B. (Hons.) for the academic year 2025-26. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous since the petitioner has been allowed to appear in supplementary exams for the term of 2nd Semester of 1st year, B.A., L.L.B. (Hons.) for the academic year 2025-26. 3. Learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2 does not dispute the same. 4. In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed as MOHD AYUBhaving been rendered infructuous. 2026.07.07 14:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CWP-19549-2026 (O&M) -2- 5. Dismissed as infructuous. 6. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. July 06th, 2026 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) Ayub/Sahil JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MOHD AYUB 2026.07.07 14:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.