1 APHC010632782025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 12177/2025 Between: 1. NARUBOINA MANOHAR, S/O GURRAPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC FARMERR/O 5-154, BOJJAVARIPALLI, UPPARAPALLE, KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. NARUBOINA ESWARAMMA, W/O MANOHAR, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O 5-154, BOJJAVARIPALLI, UPPARAPALLE, KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. NARUBOINA SRILATHA, W/O GORLA KISHORE, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC SACHIVALAYAM EMPLOYEER/O 5/125, LIBRARY STREET, BOJJAVARIPALLI, UPPARAPALLE, KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. NARUBOINA MADHUSUDHAN YADAV, S/O N.MANOHAR, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC SOFTWARE ENGINEER,R/O 5/154, LIBRARY STREET, BOJJAVARIPALLI, PRODDATUR, KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. GORLA KISHORE, S/O GORLA OBULESH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCCSOFTWARE ENGINEER, R/O SOMPALLI, MUDDANUR, UPPALUR, KADAPA DISTRICT. 6. NALLASINGHU VENKATA RAMANA, S/O KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC APSPDCL LINE INSPECTOR, R/O 4-27, THIPPIREDDY PALLI, OBAYAPALLE, CHAPADU, CHAPADU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 7. PAMIDI RAVI, S/O SUBBALANNA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCCFARMER, R/O 4-53, THIPIREDDYPALLI, CHAPADU, CHAPADUMANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) 2 AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE P.S, PRODDATUR RURAL POLICE STATION, KADAPA DISTRICT.REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATHI. 2. VAJJALA SREEDHAR, S/O SUBBANNA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, OCC RETIRED ADDL. SP, R/O FLAT NO.306, MV AURUM APARTMENTS, BOTANICAL GARDEN ROAD, OPP CHIREC PUBLIC SCHOOL, HYDERABAD, R.R.DISTRICT, TELANGANA. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. V NITESH Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2. K RAGHU VEER The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 12177/2025 O R D E R: 1. Heard Sri V.Nitesh, learned Counsel for Petitioners and of Sri K.G.Krishnamuthy, learned Senior Counsel appearing for Sri K.Raghu Veer, learned Counsel for Respondent No.2. 3. At the time of initial hearing of this matter, as per the directions of this Court dated 24.11.2025 the Police have complied with the provisions of Section 41-A of Criminal Procedure Code corresponding Section 35(3) of the B.N.S.S. The investigation is at progressive stage. Equally, whether the Petitioners have committed the alleged offences or not is a subject matter of thorough investigation, inasmuch as there are certain allegations leveled against them by Respondent No.2. At this juncture, it is not legally reasonable and permissible to examine the F.I.R., and undertake the exercise of quashment of the proceedings, for this simple reason that this court cannot legitimately stifle the process of the investigation. 4. In view of the above, the Criminal Petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the Petitioners to approach this Court at appropriate time with suitable petition, after filing of the charge sheet. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 20.01.2026 KS 4 134 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 12177 of 2025 Dated: 20.01.2026. Date: 20.01.2026 KS