HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 18556 of 2026 Court No. - 21 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. We have heard Sri Devansh Misra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Uttara Bahuguna, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel. Sri S.K. Mishra appears for the the U.P. State Industrial Development Authority. 2. The instant writ petition is preferred with an innocuous prayer for a direction commanding the respondent no. 4 to consider and decide the restoration application preferred by the petitioner well within the stipulated time. 3. At the outset, Sri S.K. Mishra, on the instructions, submits that no such relief can be accorded as the representation already stood rejected on 25.07.2017. 4. Confronted with the situation, Sri Devansh Misra, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed and leave may be accorded to press the relief in accordance with law. 5. Accordingly, the instant writ petition dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. May 12, 2026 gp Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Devansh Misra, Sanjay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anuj Pratap Singh, C.S.C. (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Jyotika Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GANESH PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad