1 CGHC010255542022 2026:CGHC:28870 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3492 of 2022 1 - Jai Maa Kali Tent House Through Proprietor Sameer Das, S/o Late Shri S. Das Aged About 52 Years R/o Qtr.No. 89/2, Near Shani Mandir, Ward No. 14, Sanjay Nagar Ward, Dantewada, Civil And Revenue District South Bastar Dantewada (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector, Dantewada Civil And Revenue, District : Dantewada, Chhattisgarh 3 - Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development Department, Dantewada, Civil And Revenue, District : Dantewada, Chhattisgarh 4 - Executive Director, N.M.D.C. Zone Bacheli, Civil And Revenue, District : Dantewada, Chhattisgarh 5 - Executive Director, N.M.D.C. Zone Kirandul, Civil And Revenue, District : Dantewada, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None For Respective Respondents : Mr. Trivikram Nayak, Advocate and Mr. SS Choubey, Government Advocate SHYNA AJAY Digitally signed by SHYNA AJAY Date: 2026.07.14 10:58:33 +0530 2 SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 10/07/2026 1. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner even when the matter was called twice. However, in the interest of justice, this Court has proceeded to examine the case on merits. 2. Perused the record. 3. It is contended in the petition that on account of the orders dated 13.7.2018 and 20.8.2018 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development Department, Dantewada, the petitioner has been provided the requisite work. It has been further contended in the petition that the petitioner has completed the work assigned to him in respect of catering, tent service etc. However, according to the petitioner the total bill as well as the amount which is required to be paid by the Tribal Department has not been paid till date though several applications have been filed by him. 4. Considering the aforesaid aspect of the matter and considering the documents annexed by the petitioner especially the orders dated 13.07.2018 as well as 20.08.2018 by which the petitioner was directed to complete the work as well as provide the services rendered by the petitioner in respect of catering, tent etc., the respondent authorities are directed to consider the claim of the petitioner and pass an appropriate orders in accordance with law. 3 However, it is made clear that this Court has not passed any orders on merits of the case and it is upon the respondent authorities to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law while taking into consideration of this aspect that according to their orders the petitioner has complied with and provided the services of catering, tent, etc as required by the authorities. This exercise be done within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The petitioner is at liberty to approach before the authorities concerned while placing the order of this Court before the concerned authorities in order to get relief which the petitioner has sought for. 5. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Shyna Ajay